shows Labor risks losing almost half of its votes if it writes climate out of Australia's environment laws, and seven in ten Australians back strong climate safeguards for new coal and gas projects.
Australians expect the national environment law to protect people and nature from climate harm, not wave through more climate pollution, new YouGov research shows.
The research shows:
68% of voters think the law should protect our environment from the impacts of climate change70% want climate impacts considered when assessing fossil fuel projectsFour in five Labor voters (78%) say it would be the wrong decision for the Prime Minister to exclude climate change in the environment laws, andAlmost half of Labor voters say they will be less likely to vote for Labor if the laws don't address climate change.
This polling lands at a pivotal moment with Australia set to take on the COP31 presidency and the Government looking to prove its climate credentials to both Australians and the international community.
YouGov Director, Public Affairs and Public Data, Paul Smith said: "The data shows that if the government delivers environment laws that ignore climate change, it risks being punished by up to 44% of its 2025 voters at the ballot box."
Climate Council CEO Amanda McKenzie said: "Australians can see climate damage all around them, from bleached reefs to deadly heat and fires. They expect our environment laws to seriously consider climate pollution from new coal, oil and gas projects, and to curb projects that make the crisis worse. Anything less is a green light for more damage."
Lock the Gate National Coordinator Carmel Flint said: "Australians want the Federal Government to keep oversight of big environmental decisions that affect us all. Our national environment law should prevent coal and gas mines from harming precious water resources like our rivers, springs and aquifers rather than leaving such decisions solely to state governments."
/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.